Originally published in Cinema Knife Fight January 15, 2018
THE COMMUTER (2018) is the newest venue for star Liam Neeson (STAR WARS: THE PHANTOM MENANCE, 1999, SCHINDLER’S LIST, 1993) who has been cranking out one action film after another, such as the TAKEN series (2008 – 2014), RUN ALL NIGHT (2015), UNKNOWN(2011) and NON-STOP (2014), many of these while in his sixties when those of his ilk would begin taking on slower, more introspective roles. When I saw the trailer for THE COMMUTER, it looked a lot like NON-STOP, except moving from airplane to train. And there are a lot of similarities: an everyman caught in the midst of a web of deceit and set up to be the fall guy for someone’s grand schemes. Because of this, I went into the film with some bias, expecting more of the same. Despite the similarities, THE COMMUTER still stands on its own, with some unique twists, and overall it’s a very engaging and intense thriller from director Jaume Collet-Serra (UNKNOWN, 2011, ORPHAN, 2009 and, not surprisingly, NON-STOP). Written by newcomers (this is their first feature film) Byron Willinger and Philip de Blasi (with some help from NON-STOP screenwriter Ryan Engle), THE COMMUTER kept me glued to the screen as one hurdle after another is thrown at everyman Michael McCauley (Neeson), wondering how in the world he was going to get out of his predicament.
THE COMMUTER (2018) is the newest venue for star Liam Neeson (STAR WARS: THE PHANTOM MENANCE, 1999, SCHINDLER’S LIST, 1993) who has been cranking out one action film after another, such as the TAKEN series (2008 – 2014), RUN ALL NIGHT (2015), UNKNOWN(2011) and NON-STOP (2014), many of these while in his sixties when those of his ilk would begin taking on slower, more introspective roles. When I saw the trailer for THE COMMUTER, it looked a lot like NON-STOP, except moving from airplane to train. And there are a lot of similarities: an everyman caught in the midst of a web of deceit and set up to be the fall guy for someone’s grand schemes. Because of this, I went into the film with some bias, expecting more of the same. Despite the similarities, THE COMMUTER still stands on its own, with some unique twists, and overall it’s a very engaging and intense thriller from director Jaume Collet-Serra (UNKNOWN, 2011, ORPHAN, 2009 and, not surprisingly, NON-STOP). Written by newcomers (this is their first feature film) Byron Willinger and Philip de Blasi (with some help from NON-STOP screenwriter Ryan Engle), THE COMMUTER kept me glued to the screen as one hurdle after another is thrown at everyman Michael McCauley (Neeson), wondering how in the world he was going to get out of his predicament.
Though
it’s not perfect, it fits in well with the genre and the overall effect is a
tight and tense thriller, though with very few
original elements in plot.
In
brief, McCauley has taken the commuter train between the Burroughs and New York
City every day for ten years (as shown very cleverly, and with some fantastic
visual effects in the opening credit sequence), having retired as a police
officer and now doing well as an insurance salesman. Every morning he spends
time with his wife Karen (Elizabeth McGovern of the DOWNTON ABBY TV
Series, underused here except as motivation for her husband’s actions) and
college-bound son Danny (Dean-Charles Chapman, the last man to hold the Iron
Throne – so far – in the GAME OF THRONES TV Series),
is dropped off at the station, and amid small talk with his fellow commuters,
travels to work.
On
this day, Michael is bestowed the usual benefit modern corporations hand out to
their aging employees: a pink slip, only in this case with no severance pay.
Facing debt at home and his son’s upcoming college bills, he has a few drinks
with his old partner Alex (Patrick Wilson – THE CONURING,
2013, INSIDIOUS, 2010) before getting back on the train
and wondering how he’s going to tell his wife he no longer has a job. Enter
mysterious stranger Joanna, who strikes up a conversation and offers him a
large sum of money to find someone on the train who does not belong, someone
going by the name Prynne. Prynne has a bag containing something they’ve stolen,
at least according to Joanna. In return, Michael is given ten thousand dollars
hidden in one of the train’s bathrooms, with a promise of more to come if he
succeeds in his mission.
This
request seemed a little odd to me. These mysterious bad guys have eyes
everywhere on the train, and in some cases must have hidden cameras, since they
know Michael’s every move at the moment he does them. I would have assumed
they’d find a less complicated way of finding this mysterious person. When
Michael resists, they pull out the big incentive—they will kill his wife and
son if he doesn’t comply.
I
liked the character of Joanna. She appears very little on screen during the
film, mostly over the phone—various phones they somehow know the numbers to
depending on whom Michael is sitting near. Played with quiet menace by Vera
Farmiga (THE CONJURING, 2013, BATES MOTEL TV
Series), she is a good antagonist for our hapless everyman, if not a little
omniscient. As the film goes on, one wonders how wide-reaching and all-seeing
her organization is, though this is never truly explained.
THE COMMUTER has a few dangling questions like this which one needs
to set aside, hoping they are wrapped up in the end. As the film comes to its
climactic end, it seems most of them will never be answered, though there is a
short epilogue in which some are, even if posed more
as theory than anything else. Still, it was a good way to tie up some of the
loose ends.
Coming
into the theater to watch THE COMMUTER, the viewer wants,
first and foremost, an action-packed thriller and this is what they will get.
As Michael is resigned to his task, he begins detective work to weed out, from
the hundreds of commuters, who might be the person his sudden employers are
looking for. This part of the script is clever and enjoyable to watch, like a
good Sherlock-ian mystery unfolding one discovered clue at a time. Early in the
film we are given glimpses of those who end up making the final list of
suspects, but very quickly we, and our main character, understand that the
person he is looking for might not have done anything wrong and is, in fact, in
terrible danger.
As
the train roars out of the city towards the last stop (before which our hero
must complete his task, or his family will die), I wondered how he was going to
get out of this. I suppose that’s the sign of a good thriller, which must
instill a desperate urgency in the viewer to see the conflict resolved, but
never be quite certain how the protagonist will accomplish it.
Neeson
is just the actor to bring us along for the ride. Say what you will about the
cookie-cutter action films he’s done—and one wonders if these are mostly to pay
the bills and free the actor to do the occasional dramatic or fun role
(including voicing a few animated characters) —Liam Neeson has a unique and
powerful presence. When he is on the screen (pretty much every second of this
film), the viewer is riveted. With his rugged, handsome persona and
whisky-rough Irish brogue, the man still makes women swoon and men want to be
on his side, hence his apparent lack of unemployment.
Another impressive aspect
of his performance is, regardless of how many films he has made, when the story
plays out, one does not feel like they are watching Liam Neeson playing a
character, but watching the character himself. It’s what actors strive for, and
he manages to do it, even in roles that seem to bleed into each other over
time.
Some
technical details of this movie struck me as quite good. Kudos to the sound
department. I looked for one person, such as a sound editor, to call out here,
but there was simply a decent-sized team of foley, recording, and mixing
engineers that, as a whole, added greatly to the tense effects of the film.
More so than the soundtrack, which was the standard sweeping score one hears in
these films but otherwise, mostly forgettable. But the sound: from the constant
clicking of the wheels on the tracks to Michael’s feet flailing against pea
stones under the train, to the slight but constant pings and knocks of cables
and chains, the overall effect, especially in a theater, was wonderfully
immersive. As well, the action scenes were well-shot pieces with enjoyable
fight sequences. I’ve noticed and appreciated in recent films that fights
between characters have taken on a more realistic air to them, more messy and
scrabbly than the over-choreographed battles of old. The movie takes place
inside the train throughout, but when effects are needed outside miniatures and
CGI are used effectively (only effectively, nothing
eye-popping).
THE COMMUTER is chock full of minor characters, being a film about a
train full of people, and the small group of suspects Michael must weed through
do a decent job in the roles they’re given. Mostly unknowns, they to add a dose
of realism to the movie. I was shocked to discover one minor character, police
Captain Hawthorne, was played by veteran actor Sam Neill (JURRASIC
PARK and THE PIANO, both 1993). I did not
recognize him and though he had only a few lines, he was good with them.
In
the end, as with all thrillers, there’s a climax and a revelation about players
in this cat and mouse game, and the disclosure that characters one might think
are bad were actually okay folks. Here, I feel, the script fell a little flat.
Certain statements are made in scene which felt out of place, but were pivotal
in flushing out a secret baddie who says the wrong thing and thus exposes their
sinister leanings. Though we always want a happy ending, some moments (you’ll
know what they are if you see them) are just a tad too silly.
THE COMMUTER was exactly what it set out to be, a fast-paced
thriller with plenty of action and thrills to satisfy viewers. Neeson’s
performance is stellar as always. It’s a safe film, taking no risks with the
story or characters outside of what we’ve seen in the past. Even so, if you
like your action movies fast and engaging with everyman Liam Neeson fighting
for justice, this is a good one to check out, especially in the theaters, to
appreciate the work of those sound folks.
As
a thriller, I give it two and a half knives (if I had
to compare it to, say, this year’s Oscar contenders, I might slip a knife out
of the pile, but honestly, director Collet-Serra wasn’t trying to make one of
those).